IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 20, 2018

The Proxy Statement related to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2017 and directions to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are available athttps://starportal.phxa.com/tpc/validate.aspx.

TRITON PACIFIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION INC.

6701 Center Drive, 14th Floor Suite 1450

Los Angeles, California 90045

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On October 21, 2016June 20, 2018

PROXY STATEMENT

GENERAL

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors (the “Board”) of Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Friday, October 21, 2016,Wednesday, June 20, 2018, at the offices of the Company located at 6701 Center Drive, 14th Floor,Suite 1450, Los Angeles, California 90045, and any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). This Proxy Statement and the accompanying materials are first being mailedmade available to stockholders of record described below on or about September 16, 2016.May __, 2018.

All properly executed proxies representing shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company (the “Shares”) received prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions marked thereon.If no specification is made, the Shares covered by the proxy card will be voted FOR the proposal to elect each of the director nominees, and FOR ratification of the appointment of FGMK, LLC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20162018 and “FOR” the proposal to authorize the Company to decrease its required asset coverage ratio from 200% to 150%, allowing it to incur additional leverage beyond current limits. Any stockholder who has given a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time prior to its exercise.Stockholdersexercise. Stockholders who execute proxies may revoke them with respect to a proposal by submitting a letter of revocation or a later-dated proxy to the Company at the above address prior to the date of the Annual Meeting, voting by telephone or Internet after you have given your proxy, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting his or her Shares in person.

Stockholders of record (i.e., stockholders who hold Shares directly in their own names) who attend the Meeting may vote in person whether or not he or she has previously voted his or her shares. Stockholders who hold their shares in an account with a broker, bank or other institution or nominee (“Broker Shares”), may vote such shares at the Meeting only after obtaining proper written authority from their institution or nominee and present that authority at the Meeting.

Quorum

The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of stock of the Company entitled to cast one third of the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting (without regard to class) shall constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. Shares for which brokers have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and do not have discretionary authority to vote the shares on certain proposals (which are considered “Broker Non-Votes” with respect to such proposals) will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes. However, abstentions and Broker Non-Votes are not counted as votes cast. If a quorum is not present at the Meeting, the stockholders who are represented may adjourn the Meeting until a quorum is present. The persons named as proxies will vote those proxies for such adjournment, unless the proxies are marked to be voted against any proposal for which an adjournment is sought, to permit the further solicitation of proxies.

Record Date

The Board has fixed the close of business on September 12, 2016April 26, 2018 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and all adjournments or postponements thereof. As of the Record Date, there were 842,218.841,486,166.98 shares of our common stock outstanding which were held by 327694 record holders.

Required Vote

Election of Director Nominees.Each director shall be elected by a plurality of all the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy, provided that a quorum is present. Stockholders may not cumulate their votes. Abstentions will not be included in determining the number of votes cast and, as a result, will have no effect on this proposal.Any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker non-vote or otherwise) or voted against a nominee will have no impact on the election of directors, except to the extent that the failure to vote for an individual results in another individual receiving a larger proportion of votes.Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote for the election of directors. As a result, absent specific voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the Shares, brokers will not be permitted to vote Shares for the election of directors.

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy, provided that a quorum is present, is required to ratify the appointment of FGMK, LLC to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 20162018 fiscal year. Abstentions will not be included in determining the number of votes cast and, as a result, will not have any effect on the result of the vote. Because brokers will have discretionary authority to vote for the ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in the event that they do not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the Shares, brokers will be permitted to vote Shares for this proposal.

Approval of the proposal to authorize the Company to decrease its required asset coverage ratio from 200% to 150%.The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy, provided that a quorum is present, is required to approve this proposal. For purposes of the vote on this proposal, abstentions and Broker Non-Votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

Voting

You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy in accordance with the instructions provided below. Stockholders of the Company are entitled to one vote for each Share held as of the Record Date.

When voting by proxy and mailing your proxy card, you are required to:

Stockholders also have the following two options for authorizing a proxy to vote their shares:

The Company has enclosed a copy of this proxy statement and proxy card and a copy of the Company’s Annual Report. If you plan on attending the Annual Meeting and voting your Shares in person, you will need to bring photo identification in order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting. To obtain directions to the Annual Meeting, please call the Company at (804) 893-3712.

Other Information Regarding This Solicitation

The Company will bear the expense of the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting, including the cost of preparing, printing and mailing this proxy statement, the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and the proxy card. The Company has requested that brokers, nominees, fiduciaries and other persons holding Shares in their names, or in the name of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others, forward the proxy materials to, and obtain proxies from, such beneficial owners. The Company will reimburse such persons for their reasonable expenses in so doing.

In addition to the solicitation of proxies by the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited in person and/or by telephone or facsimile transmission by directors, officers or employees of the Company and/or officers or employees of Triton Pacific Adviser, LLC (the “Adviser”), the Company’s investment adviser. The Adviser is located at 6701 Center Drive, 14th Floor,Suite 1450, Los Angeles, California 90045. No additional compensation will be paid to directors, officers or regular employees of the Company or the Adviser for such services. The Company has engaged Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company to provide certain proxy-related services. The incremental cost to the Company to engage Continentaluse its transfer agent is approximately $6,700$3,500 plus reasonable and approved out-of-pocket expenses. In the event that the Company decides to engage a proxy solicitation firm to assist with the solicitation of proxies, that the additional cost would be borne by us.

Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth, as of the Record Date, the beneficial ownership of the nominees for director, the Company’s executive officers, each person known to the Company to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding Shares, and all of the Company’s executive officers and directors as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. There are no Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.

Set forth below is the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each of our directors as of the Record Date. We are not part of a “family of investment companies,” as that term is defined in the Investment 1940 Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders are being asked to consider the election of the current directors of the Company. Pursuant to the Company’s charter documents, the number of directors on the Board may not be fewer than three (except for a period of up to 60 days after the death, removal or resignation of a director pending the election of such director’s successor) or greater than eleven. Directors of the Company are elected annually for a term of one year, and serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The Board is currently comprised of five directors.

Each director named below has been nominated for election by the Board, has agreed to serve as a director if elected and has consented to being named as a nominee. No person being nominated as a director is being proposed for election pursuant to any agreement or understanding between such person and the Company.

A stockholder can vote for, or withhold his or her vote from, any or all of the director nominees.In the absence of instructions to the contrary, it is the intention of the persons named as proxies to vote such proxy FOR the election of each of the director nominees named below. If any of the director nominees should decline or be unable to serve as a director, it is intended that the proxy will be voted for the election of such person or persons as are nominated as replacements.The Board has no reason to believe that any of the persons named will be unable or unwilling to serve.

Information about the Board and Director Nominees

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors. The responsibilities of the board of directors include, among other things, the oversight of our investment activities and financing arrangements, quarterly valuations of our assets and corporate governance activities. The board of directors will have an audit committee and may establish additional committees from time to time as necessary. Although the number of directors may be increased or decreased, a decrease will not shorten the term of any incumbent director. Any director may resign at any time or may be removed with or without cause by the stockholders upon the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at a meeting called for the purpose of the proposed removal. The notice of the meeting shall indicate that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to determine if a director should be removed.

A vacancy created by an increase in the number of directors or by the death, resignation, removal, adjudicated incompetence or other incapacity of a director may be filled only by a vote of a majority of the remaining directors. As provided in our charter, nominations of individuals to fill the vacancy of a board seat previously filled by an independent director will be made by the remaining independent directors.

Board of Directors and Executive Officers.

Our board of directors consists of five members, a majority of whom are not “interested persons” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. We refer to these individuals as our independent directors. The Chairman of the Board is Craig Faggen, who is an interested director. As is described below under the heading “Audit Committee”, our board has an audit committee, consisting of our three independent directors, who will be responsible for assuring the proper valuation of our assets and the net asset value of our shares. Our leadership structure is designed to provide that we are led by a team with the necessary management experience to guide us, while assuring an independent check on management decisions and our financial well-being.

Directors and Executive Officers

Information regarding our board of directors is set forth below. We have divided the directors into two groups—interested directors and independent directors. The address for each director is c/o Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, Inc., 6701 Center Drive, 14th Floor,Suite 1450, Los Angeles, CA 90045.

Biographical Information

Interested Directors:

Craig J. Faggen:Mr. Faggen is our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Faggen has over 1520 years of experience developing and implementing strategic initiatives and structuring numerous complex capital markets transactions. For the past five years, Mr. Faggen has served as the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Triton Pacific, which includes TPCP, and has been actively involved in building its private equity division. As CEO of Triton Pacific, Mr. Faggen has overall firm oversight responsibilities. Prior to co-founding Triton Pacific, he was a founder and a partner in the boutique investment banking firm Triton Pacific Capital, LLC. There he was instrumental in the due diligence, structuring, and closing of several billion dollars of transactions. Prior to co-founding Triton Pacific, Mr. Faggen worked in Arthur Andersen’s Capital Markets Group, where he acted as a financial advisor to a number of public and private companies on various transactions including IPOs, securitized debt transactions, equity private placements, dispositions and M&A related opportunities. Mr. Faggen received a B.A. in Economics from UCLA and a Master’s Degree from MIT. Craig Faggen sits on the board of a number of private companies, most of which are portfolio companies of investment funds managed or sponsored by Triton Pacific Capital Partners, LLC or its affiliates. Mr. Faggen does not sit on the board of any other public companies. Mr. Faggen is the son of one of our directors, Ivan Faggen.

Ivan Faggen:Mr. Faggen has over 45 years of experience providing strategic advice and executing capital market transactions. He co-founded, with his son Craig Faggen, and is actively involved in the business of Triton Pacific and TPCP. For the past five years, he has served as a partner of Triton Pacific and TPCP and has been actively involved in their management and operations. Mr. Faggen spent over 33 years at Arthur Andersen working with small and mid-size companies on a variety of strategic, operational, and financial issues. Prior to his departure, he was one of seven Worldwide Directors of Arthur Andersen’s Industry Group. In that position, he not only built an advisory practice with $300 million of annual revenues, but was also instrumental in facilitating hundreds of domestic and international transactions. He received a B.S. in Business Administration from Wayne State University and is a retired CPA. In addition, he served as Chairman of the Counselors of Real Estate, Chairman of the Counselors of Real Estate Foundation and was a member of the advisory board of the Carlyle Group. Ivan Faggen sits on the board of a number of private companies, most of which are portfolio companies of investment funds managed or sponsored by Triton Pacific Capital Partners, LLC or its affiliates. Mr. Faggen does not sit on the board of any other public companies.

Independent Directors:

Ronald W. Ruther:For the past five years, Mr. Ruther has served as an independent business advisor to small businesses, their owners and a coach to their CEOs. During the past 20 years, he has served on many boards of directors for privately owned companies with annual sales ranging from $10 million to over $150 million. As a Director, Mr. Ruther has served as Chairman of Governance, Audit and Compensation Committees. Prior to this, Mr. Ruther was with Arthur Andersen & Co. for 32 years and took early retirement in 1992. As a tax partner for over 20 years and Head of the Tax Practice in Orange County, California, Mr. Ruther specialized in business consulting, mergers and acquisitions, executive compensation, employee benefits and family wealth planning. His clients ranged from start-ups to large public corporations. Mr. Ruther received a B.S. in Business from Northwestern University and a J.D. from Northwestern Law School. He is a retired CPA and an inactive member of the Illinois Bar.

Marshall Goldberg:DuringFor the past five years, Mr. Goldberg has served as the chair of a charitable initiative, an endowment committee and on the boards of several community and charitable organizations, although Mr. Goldberg recently retired from these charitable endeavors.organizations. Prior to that, Mr. Goldberg, served in various capacities in a thirty-year career with Prudential Financial Services, Inc. As Corporate Vice President for Agent Training and Manpower Development, he was responsible for agency training for the company’s 35,000 person field force. Mr. Goldberg participated as a lead principal in the development and introduction of its Universal Life insurance product which soon became the dominant variable life contract in the insurance industry. As a Regional Marketing Vice President, he headed several sales organizations staffed by thousands of agents and field staff. As Senior Vice President of the Prudential Home Mortgage Company, he led a national sales and production organization and served on the risk management and enterprise management committees. Mr. Goldberg received a B.S.B.A. in Economics from the University of Florida and acquired several financial services designations.

William Pruitt:For the past five years, Mr. Pruitt has served as the general manager of Pruitt Enterprises, LP and president of Pruitt Ventures, Inc. Previously, Mr. Pruitt served as the managing partner for the Florida, Caribbean and Venezuela operations of the independent auditing firm of Arthur Andersen, LLP. Mr. Pruitt has been an independent board member of multiple boards, including Swisher Hygiene, Inc., NV5, Inc., MAKO Surgical Corp., and PBSJ Corporation, and KOS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Corporation. Mr. Pruitt received a B.A. in Business Administration from the University of Miami and is a CPA.CPA (inactive).

Executive Officers (who are not directors):

Michael Carroll,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary:Mr. Carroll has served as our Chief Financial Officer and secretary since inception, and has extensive experience in the area of financial accounting and has spent several years at Triton Pacific managing fund finances and investor relations. Prior to joining Triton Pacific, Mr. Carroll managed the business functions and accounts of various political organizations and worked on Capitol Hill. Prior experiences include serving as Deputy Treasurer of Virginians for Jerry Kilgore, a Richmond-based candidate committee, where Mr. Carroll managed the committees’ campaign contributions, totaling over $22 million. Mr. Carroll received a B.S. from Virginia Commonwealth University.

Risk Oversight and Board Structure

Board Leadership Structure

The Company’s business and affairs are managed under the direction of the Board. Among other things, the Board sets broad policies for the Company and approves the appointment of the Company’s investment advisers, administrator and officers. The role of the Board, and of any individual director, is one of oversight and not of management of the Company’s day-to-day affairs.

Under the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, the Board may designate one of the Company’s directors as chair to preside over meetings of the Board and meetings of stockholders, and to perform such other duties as may be assigned to him or her by the Board. Presently, Mr. Craig Faggen holds the dual positions of chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and is an “interested person” by virtue of his employment with the Adviser. The Company believes that it is in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders for Mr. Faggen to serve as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board because of his significant experience in matters of relevance to the Company’s business. The Board has determined that the composition of the Audit Committee (consisting solely of Independent Directors) is an appropriate means to address any potential conflicts of interest that may arise from the Chairman’s status as CEO and an interested person of the Company. The Company believes that the Board’s flexibility to determine its Chairman and reorganize its leadership structure from time to time is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Each year, the Independent Directors will designate an Independent Director to serve as the lead Independent Director on the Board. The designation of a lead Independent Director is for a one-year term and a lead Independent Director may be eligible for re-election at the end of that term. If the lead Independent Director is unavailable for a meeting, his or her immediate predecessor will serve as lead Independent Director for such meeting. The lead Independent Director will preside over meetings of the Company’s Independent Board. The lead Independent Director will also serve as a liaison between the Company’s Independent Board and the Company’s management on a wide variety of matters, including agenda items for the Board meetings. Designation as such does not impose on the lead Independent Director any obligations or standards greater than or different from those of the Company’s other directors. Mr. Ruther currently serves as the Independent Board’s lead Independent Director.

All of the Independent Directors play an active role on the Board. The Independent Directors compose a majority of the Board and are closely involved in all material deliberations related to the Company. The Board believes that, with these practices, each Independent Director has an equal involvement in the actions and oversight role of the Board and equal accountability to the Company and its stockholders. The Independent Directors are expected to meet separately (i) as part of each regular Board meeting and (ii) with the Company’s chief compliance officer, as part of at least one Board meeting each year. The Independent Director committee may hold additional meetings at the request of the lead Independent Director or another Independent Director.

The Board believes that its leadership structure—a chair of the Board with the requisite experience, a lead independent director, and committees led by independent directors—is the optimal structure for the Company at this time because it allows the Company’s directors to exercise informed and independent judgment, and allocates areas of responsibility among committees of independent directors and the full Board in a manner that enhances effective oversight. The Board is of the opinion that having a majority of independent directors is appropriate and in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders, but also believes that having two interested persons serve as directors brings both corporate and financial viewpoints that are significant elements in its decision-making process. The Board will review its leadership structure periodically as part of its annual self-assessment process and may make changes to it at any time, including in response to changes in the characteristics or circumstances of the Company.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board oversees the Company’s business and operations, including certain risk management functions. Risk management is a broad concept comprising many disparate elements (for example, investment risk, issuer and counterparty risk, compliance risk, operational risk, and business continuity risk). The Board implements its risk oversight function both as a whole and through its committees. In the course of providing oversight, the Board and its committees receive reports on the Company’s and the Advisers’ activities, including reports regarding the Company’s investment portfolio and financial accounting and reporting. The Board also receives a quarterly report from the Company’s chief compliance officer, who reports on the Company’s compliance with the federal and state securities laws and the Company’s internal compliance policies and procedures as well as those of the Advisor, the managing dealer for the Offering (the “Managing Dealer”), the Company’s administrator and the Company’s transfer agent. The Audit Committee’s meetings with the Company’s independent public accounting firm also contribute to its oversight of certain internal control risks. In addition, the Board meets periodically with the Adviser to receive reports regarding the Company’s operations, including reports on certain investment and operational risks, and the Independent Directors are encouraged to communicate directly with senior members of the Company’s management.

The Board believes that this role in risk oversight is appropriate for the Company at this time. The Company believes that there are robust internal processes in place and a strong internal control environment to identify and manage risks. However, not all risks that may affect the Company can be identified or processes and controls developed to eliminate or mitigate their occurrence or effects, and some risks are beyond the control of the Company, the Adviser and the Company’s other service providers.

Meetings of the Board of Directors

During the fiscal year of 2015,2017, our board of directors held four board meetings and four Audit Committee meetings. All directors attended all of the meetings of the board of directors and of the respective committees on which they serve. We require each director to make a diligent effort to attend all board and committee meetings as well as each annual meeting of our stockholders.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Audit Committee

Our audit committee is composed wholly of our independent directors. A copy of the charter of our audit committee is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement. The audit committee is responsible for approving our independent accountants, reviewing with our independent accountants the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by our independent accountants, reviewing the independence of our independent accountants and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. The audit committee is also responsible for aiding our board of directors in fair value pricing debt and equity securities that are not publicly-traded or for which current market values are not readily available and for determining the net asset value of our shares. The board of directors and audit committee may utilize the services of an independent valuation firm to help them determine the fair value of these securities. Messrs. Pruitt, Goldberg and Ruther are the members of our audit committee, and Mr. Ruther is the chairman. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Ruther is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under relevant SEC rules.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The board of directors has not yet designated a separate Nominating and Corporate Governance committee. Instead, the entire board of directors performs the functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance committee does not have a written charter. The board (acting as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) is responsible for selecting, researching and nominating directors for election by our stockholders, selecting nominees to fill vacancies on the board of directors or a committee thereof, developing and recommending a set of corporate governance principles and overseeing the evaluation of our management.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks candidates who possess the background, skills and expertise to make a significant contribution to the board of directors, the Company and its stockholders. In considering possible candidates for election as a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account, in addition to such other factors as it deems relevant, the desirability of selecting directors who:

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. In determining whether to recommend a director nominee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers and discusses diversity, among other factors, with a view toward the needs of the board of directors as a whole. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee generally conceptualizes diversity expansively to include, without limitation, concepts such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill and other qualities that contribute to the board of directors, when identifying and recommending director nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the inclusion of diversity as one of many factors considered in selecting director nominees is consistent with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s goal of creating a board of directors that best serves the needs of the Company and its stockholders.

Stockholder Recommendation of Director Candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates, including the minimum criteria set forth above, based on whether the candidate was recommended by a stockholder or not. Stockholders who wish to recommend individuals for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to become nominees for election to the Board may do so by delivering a written recommendation to our secretary at the address set forth on the cover page of this Proxy Statement. Recommendations for individuals to be considered for nomination at the 20172019 Annual Meeting must be received by December 31, 2016.2018. Recommendations received after December 31, 20162018 will not be considered for nomination at the 20172019 Annual Meeting. Submissions must include the full name of the proposed nominee, a description of the proposed nominee’s business experience for at least the previous five years, complete biographical information, a description of the proposed nominee’s qualifications as a director and a representation that the nominating stockholder is a beneficial or record owner of our stock. Any such submission must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.

Compensation Committee

Because none of our executive officers are compensated by the Company, the board does not maintain a separate Compensation Committee. Instead, the entire board performs the functions of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee does not have a written charter.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the last fiscal year, the entire Board performed the functions of the Compensation Committee. None of our executive officers has ever served as a director of another entity any of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee.

Compensation of Directors

On December 15, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Director Agreement”) with its three independent directors, Marshall Goldberg, William Pruitt and Ronald Ruther, whereby the Independent Directors agreed to certain revisions to their compensation for serving as members of the Company’s Board. Specifically, effective October 1, 2014, theThe fees payable to an Independent Director shall be determined based on the Company’s net assets as of the end of each fiscal quarter and be paid quarterly in arrears as follows:

Executive Compensation

None of our executive officers will receive direct compensation from us. We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees in the foreseeable future. The services necessary for the operation of our business will be provided to us by the officers and the employees of our Adviser and Administrator pursuant to the terms of the investment adviser agreement and the administration agreement, respectively.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Company has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act, which applies to, among others, its officers, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, as well as the members of the Board. The Company’s code of business conduct and ethics will be supplied free of charge to any requestor by calling the Company at (310) 943-4990. The Company intends to disclose any amendments to or waivers of required provisions of the code of business conduct and ethics on Form 8-K, as required by the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

Communications Between Stockholders and the Board

The Board welcomes communications from the Company’s stockholders. Stockholders may send communications to the Board or to any particular director to the following address: c/o Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, Inc., 6701 Center Drive, 14th Floor,Suite 1450, Los Angeles, California 90045. Stockholders should indicate clearly the director or directors to whom the communication is being sent so that each communication may be forwarded directly to the appropriate director(s).

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The Company has procedures in place for the review, approval and monitoring of transactions involving the Company and certain persons related to the Company. For example, the Company has a code of conduct that generally prohibits any employee, officer or director from engaging in any transaction where there is a conflict between such individual’s personal interest and the interests of the Company. Waivers to the code of conduct for any executive officer or member of the Board must be approved by the Board and are publicly disclosed as required by applicable law and regulations. In addition, the Audit Committee is required to review and approve all related-party transactions (as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act). Prior to the occurrence of a liquidity event, all future transactions with affiliates of the Company will be on terms no less favorable than could be obtained from an unaffiliated third party and must be approved by a majority of the Board, including a majority of the Independent Directors.

The Company will compensate the Adviser for investment services per an Investment Adviser Agreement (“Agreement”), approved by the Independent Directors, calculated as the sum of (1) base management fee, calculated quarterly at 0.5% of the Company’s average gross assets payable quarterly in arrears, and (2) an incentive fee upon capital gains determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each quarter or upon liquidation of the Company or upon termination of Agreement at 20% of Company’s realized capital gains, as defined. The Agreement expires June 20162018 and may continue automatically for successive annual periods, as approved by the Company. The Company paid the Adviser $101,336$334,224 in base management fees during the year ended December 31, 2015.2017. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the Company earned capital gains incentive fees of $37,014($334) based on the performance of its portfolio, all of which $1,464 was for Incentive Fees calculated on realized gains, and $35,550 for Incentive Fees calculated on unrealized gains. No capital gains incentive fees are actually payable by the Company with respect to unrealized gains unless and until those gains are actually realized. All management fees earned by the Adviser prior to January 1, 2014 were waived by the Adviser.

On March 27, 2014, the Company and its Adviser agreed to an Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement, or the Expense Reimbursement Agreement. The Expense Reimbursement Agreement was amended and restated effective November 17, 2014.April 5, 2018. Under the Expense Reimbursement Agreement, as amended, the Adviser, in consultation with the Company, will pay up to 100% of both the Company’s organizational and offering expenses and its operating expenses, all as determined by the Company and the Adviser. As used in the Expense Reimbursement Agreement, operating expenses refer to third party operating costs and expenses incurred by the Company, as determined under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for investment management companies. Organizational and offering expenses include expenses incurred in connection with the organization of the Company and expenses incurred in connection with its offering, which are recorded as a component of equity. The Expense Reimbursement Agreement states that until the net proceeds to the Company from its offering are at least $25 million, the Adviser will pay up to 100% of both the Company’s organizational and offering expenses and its operating expenses. After the Company receives at least $25 million in net proceeds from its offering, the Adviser may, with the Company’s consent, continue to make expense support payments to the Company in such amounts as are acceptable to the Company and the Adviser. Any expense support payments shall be paid by the Adviser to the Company in any combination of cash, and/or offsets against amounts otherwise due from the Company to the Adviser.

Under the Expense Reimbursement Agreement as amended, once the Company has received at least $25 million in net proceeds from its offering, during any quarter occurring within three years of the date on which the Company incurred any expenses that are subject to reimbursement, the Company is required to reimburse the Adviser for any expense support payments the Company received from them. However, with respect to any expense support payments attributable to the Company’s operating expenses, (i) the Company will only reimburse the Adviser for expense support payments made by the Adviser to the extent that the payment of such reimbursement (together with any other reimbursement paid during such fiscal year) does not cause “other operating expenses” (as defined below) (on an annualized basis and net of any expense reimbursement payments received by

the Company during such fiscal year) to exceed the percentage of the Company’s average net assets attributable to shares of its common stock represented by “other operating expenses” during the fiscal year in which such expense support payment from the Adviser was made (provided, however, that this clause (i) shall not apply to any reimbursement payment which relates to an expense support payment from the Adviser made during the same fiscal year); and (ii) the Company will not reimburse the Adviser for expense support payments made by the Adviser if the annualized rate of regular cash distributions declared by the Company at the time of such reimbursement payment is less than the annualized rate of regular cash distributions declared by the Company at the time the Adviser made the expense support payment to which such reimbursement relates. “Other operating expenses” means the Company’s total operating expenses excluding base management fees, incentive fees, organization and offering expenses, financing fees and costs, interest expense, brokerage commissions and extraordinary expenses.

Below is a table that provides information regarding expense support payments incurred by our Adviser pursuant to the Expense Support Agreement as well as other information relating to our ability to reimburse our Adviser for such payments.

Of these Operating Expenses, $47,937 as of December 31, 2015offering and operating expenses, $1,941,553 has exceeded the three yearthree-year period for repayment and will not be repayable by the Company.us.

In addition, with respect to any expense support payment attributable to the Company’s organizational and offering expenses, the Company will only reimburse the Adviser for expense support payments made by the Adviser to the extent that the payment of such reimbursement (together with any other reimbursement for organizational and offering expenses paid during such fiscal year) is limited to 15% of cumulative gross sales proceeds from the Company’s offering including the sales load (or dealer manager fee) paid by the Company.

The Company or the Adviser may terminate the Expense Reimbursement Agreementexpense reimbursement agreement at any time upon thirty days’ written notice, however, the Adviser has indicated that it expects to continue such reimbursements until it deems that the Company has achieved economies of scale sufficient to ensure that the Company bears a reasonable level of expenses in relation to its income.notice. The Expense Reimbursement Agreementexpense reimbursement agreement will automatically terminate upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement or upon the Company’sour liquidation or dissolution.

The expense reimbursement agreement expires by its terms on December 31, 2018, unless extended with the mutual consent of us and our Adviser. Upon termination of the Expense Support Agreement we may be required to repay our Adviser all expense support payments made by our Adviser within three years of the date of termination, subject to the limitations contained in the agreement. The Expense Reimbursement Agreement is, by its terms, effective retroactively to our inception date of April 29, 2011. As a result, our Adviser has agreed to reimburse a total of $3,080,588$5,292,191 as of December 31, 2015, which amounts have consisted2017.

Beginning with the year ended December 31, 2016, the Adviser began to reimburse less than 100% of offsets against amounts owed by us to ouroperating expenses, and for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Adviser since our inception.did not reimburse any operating expenses after the first quarter. Additionally, the Adviser did not reimburse any offering expenses for the fourth quarter of 2017.

The Company compensates TFA Associates, LLC (an affiliate of the Company) for administration services per an Administration Agreement for costs and expenses incurred with the administration and operation of the Company. Such agreement expires June 20162018 and may continue automatically for successive annual periods, as approved by the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the Company paid TFA Associates $257,576$301.986 in administrative fees.

The dealer manager for the Company’s public offering is Triton Pacific Securities, LLC, which is one of the Company’s affiliates. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, the Company paid the dealer manager $398,363$616,188 in sales commissions and dealer fees. Of this amount, $98,817$122,150 was retained by Triton Pacific Securities, and the remainder re-allowed to third party participating broker dealers.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, the Company’s directors and executive officers, and any persons holding more than 10% of its Shares, are required to report their beneficial ownership and any changes therein to the SEC and the Company. Specific due dates for those reports have been established, and the Company is required to report herein any failure to file such reports by those due dates. Based on the Company’s review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed by such persons and information provided by the Company’s directors and officers, the Company believes that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2017, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to such persons were timely filed.

Required Vote

Each director shall be elected by a plurality of all the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy, provided that a quorum is present. Abstentions will not be included in determining the number of votes cast and, as a result, will have no effect on this proposal. Shares represented by broker non-votes are not considered entitled to vote and thus are not counted for purposes of determining whether the proposal has been approved.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE

DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

FGMK, LLC, has been appointed to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.2018. The Company knows of no direct financial or material indirect financial interest of FGMK in the Company. It is expected that a representative of FGMK will be present at the Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she chooses and will be available to answer questions.

Fees

Set forth in the table below are audit fees and non-audit related fees billed to the Company by FGMK for professional services performed for the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 20152017 and December 31, 2014: 2016:

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 20152017 and December 31, 2014,2016, no non-audit fees were paid to FGMK for services rendered to our Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with our Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Company.

The Company’s Audit Committee reviews, negotiates and approves in advance the scope of work, any related engagement letter and the fees to be charged by the independent registered public accounting firm for audit services and permitted non-audit services for the Company and for permitted non-audit services for the Company’s investment adviser and any affiliates thereof that provide services to the Company if such non-audit services have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the Company. All of the audit and non-audit services described above for which FGMK billed the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20152017 and December 31, 20142016 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Audit Committee Report

As part of its oversight of the Company’s financial statements, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with both management and FGMK, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Company’s financial statements filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2017. Management advised the Audit Committee that all financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP, and reviewed significant accounting issues with the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also discussed with FGMK the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Standards Board AU 380,Communication with Audit Committees, as amended.

The Audit Committee has established a pre-approval policy that describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax, and other services to be provided by FGMK. Pursuant to the policy, the Audit Committee pre-approves the audit and non-audit services performed by FGMK in order to assure that the provision of such service does not impair the firm’s independence.

Any requests for audit, audit-related, tax, and other services that have not received general pre-approval must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval in accordance with its pre-approval policy, irrespective of the amount, and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally, pre-approval is provided at regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee. However, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated must report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by FGMK to management.

The Audit Committee received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from FGMK required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding FGMK’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with FGMK its independence. The Audit Committee has reviewed the audit fees paid by the Company to FGMK. It has also reviewed non-audit services and fees to assure compliance with the Company’s and the Audit Committee’s policies restricting FGMK from performing services that might impair its independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 20152017 be included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152017 for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee also recommended the appointment of FGMK to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. 2018.

Required Vote

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting in person or by proxy is required to approve this proposal. Unless marked to the contrary, the shares represented by the enclosed proxy card will be voted for ratification of the appointment of FGMK, LLC as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2016.2018. Because brokers will have discretionary authority to vote for the ratification of the selection of the Company’s registered independent public accounting firm in the event that they do not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares, your broker will be permitted to vote your shares for this proposal.

The material contained in the foregoing Audit Committee Report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF FGMK, LLC AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016.2018.

PROPOSAL NO. 3

APPROVAL TO DECREASE THE REQUIRED ASSET COV ERAGE RATIO FROM 200% TO 150%

The 1940 Act generally prohibits a business development company from issuing senior securities representing indebtedness or stock unless its asset coverage, or the ratio of its gross assets (less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities) to its outstanding senior securities, does not exceed 200% at the time of issuance. On March 23, 2018, President Trump signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, also known as the “omnibus spending bill.” Under the legislation, a business development company is allowed to increase its leverage capacity from an asset coverage ratio of 200% to an asset coverage ratio of 150% if a majority of the independent directors approve the increase (to be effective in one year) or stockholders representing at least a majority of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present approve a proposal to do so (to be effective the next day). The Board of Directors believes it would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to have the flexibility to incur additional leverage. Accordingly, at a meeting held on April 18, 2018, the Board of Directors, including a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) approved the application of the modified asset coverage requirements from 200% asset coverage to 150% asset coverage. As a result, and subject to certain additional disclosure requirements as well as the repurchase obligations, both as described below, the 150% minimum asset coverage ratio will apply to the Company effective as of April 18, 2019.

The Company is now seeking stockholder approval to decrease the required asset coverage ratio from 200% to 150%, which would give the Company the ability to increase the amount of leverage it could incur effective the day after stockholder approval is received.

Asset Coverage Ratio

The Company’s ability to issue senior securities representing indebtedness or stock is governed by the 1940 Act. Specifically, Section 18 of the 1940 Act, as modified by Section 61, provides that the Company may not issue senior securities that are stock or that represent indebtedness unless, at the time of issuance, the Company maintains an asset coverage ratio of at least 200%. The asset coverage ratio for a class of senior securities representing indebtedness is calculated as our consolidated total assets, less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, divided by senior securities representing indebtedness. Section 61 now provides that the required asset coverage ratio may be decreased from 200% to 150% upon the vote of a majority of the independent directors (to be effective in one year) or stockholders representing a majority of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present approve a proposal to do so (to be effective the next day). Business development companies must provide stockholders with timely notice of such approvals and must make periodic reports of the aggregate outstanding principal amounts of senior securities issued by the business development company and the asset coverage percentage as of the most recent financial statements included in that filing, the effective date of the approval of the modified asset coverage requirements, and the principal risk factors associated with the senior securities, to the extent incurred by the business development company. Business development companies whose securities are not listed on a national securities exchange, like the Company, must also offer to repurchase the shares held by their stockholders as of the approval date. These repurchase rights are discussed in greater detail, below.

Reasons to Decrease the Required Asset Coverage Ratio

We believe that the increased flexibility that would be available to us after adoption of the modified asset coverage ratio would allow us to deploy more capital and thereby potentially increase overall returns to our stockholders. Further, we believe that increased leverage would permit us to invest in a segment of the middle market comprised of lower risk and lower yielding loans without sacrificing return to our stockholders. To date, we have not incurred any leverage to finance our investments and any decision on our part to use leverage will depend upon our assessment of the attractiveness of available investment opportunities in relation to the costs and perceived risks of such leverage. The use of leverage to finance investments creates certain risks and potential conflicts of interest.

Key Stockholder Considerations and Risk Factors

Before voting on this proposal or giving proxies with regard to this matter, stockholders should consider the effect that increased leverage could have on the Company. If this Proposal No. 3 is approved, the Company will have the ability to increase its amount of leverage, subject to certain restrictions.

Leverage magnifies the potential for loss on investments in our indebtedness and on invested equity capital. As we use leverage to partially finance our investments, you will experience increased risks of investing in our securities. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged our business. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net investment income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net investment income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to pay common stock dividends, scheduled debt payments or other payments related to our securities.

Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique. As we incur more leverage:

Leverage magnifies the potential for loss on investments in our indebtedness and on invested equity capital.

As we use leverage to partially finance our investments, you will experience increased risks of investing in our securities. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged our business. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net investment income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net investment income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to pay common stock dividends, scheduled debt payments or other payments related to our securities.

Examples of the Effect of Lowering the Required Asset Coverage Ratio

Lowering the required asset coverage ratio from 200% to 150% would permit us to incur additional leverage. At December 31, 2017, our gross assets (less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities) were approximately $17 million. Currently, we could issue up to $17 million of senior securities and purchase an additional $17 million in assets with the proceeds from that issuance, bringing gross assets (less liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities) to $34 million and still maintain leverage at the 200% asset coverage requirement. Once the asset coverage requirement is decreased to 150%, we would be able to issue up to approximately $34 million in senior securities and purchase an additional $34 million in assets with the proceeds from that issuance, bringing gross assets (less liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities) to $51 million and still maintain leverage at the 150% asset coverage requirement.

Repurchase Obligation

The 1940 Act, as revised, imposes an additional requirement on business development companies who do not have a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange. Those BDCs, like the Company, are required toextend, to each person that is a stockholder as of the date of Board or stockholder approval of the change in the asset coverage ratio, the opportunity to sell the securities held by that stockholder as of that applicable approval date, with 25 percent of those securities to be repurchased in each of the four calendar quarters following the calendar quarter in which that applicable approval date takes place. Accordingly, we intend to offer to repurchase, through tender offers, all of our outstanding shares as of April 18, 2018 held by our stockholders of record as of that date. These repurchases will take place during each of the next four calendar quarters, starting with the calendar quarter ending September 30, 2018. In accordance with the 1940 Act, in each of these quarterly tender offers, we intend to offer to repurchase up to 25% of our outstanding shares held by stockholders as of April 18, 2018.

There can be no assurance that the Company will have sufficient capital and liquidity in its investments to complete the repurchase obligations required by the 1940 Act. If we fail to comply with these repurchase requirements, or to comply with the disclosure obligations of the 1940 Act, we will continue to be subject to the 200% asset coverage requirement.

Other Considerations

In reaching its recommendation to stockholders to approve this Proposal No. 3, the Board of Directors considered a possible source of conflict of interest due to the fact that, once invested, proceeds from borrowed amounts will increase the management fees that the Company pays to its Advisor as such fees are partially based on the amount of the Company’s gross assets, excluding cash. The fee structure may encourage our Advisor to cause us to borrow money to finance additional investments or to maintain leverage when it would otherwise be appropriate to pay off our indebtedness. The Board of Directors, including the independent directors, concluded that the benefits to the Company’s stockholders from enabling the Company to incur additional leverage outweighs any detriment from potential increased management fees. The Board of Directors also considered the effect of the following factors:

Required Vote

This proposal requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast and entitled to vote thereon at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will not be included in determining the number of votes cast, and, as a result, will have no effect on this proposal. Shares represented by broker non-votes are not considered entitled to vote and thus are not counted for purposes of determining whether the proposal has been approved.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO DECREASE THE REQUIRED ASSET COVERAGE RATIO FROM 200% TO 150%.

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

The Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws require the Company to hold an annual meeting of the stockholders for the election of directors and the transaction of any business within the powers of the Company on a date and at a time set by the Board. In addition, the Company will hold special meetings as required or deemed desirable, or upon the request of holders of at least 10% of the Company’s outstanding Shares entitled to vote. Any stockholder that wishes to submit a proposal for consideration at a subsequent meeting of the stockholders should mail the proposal promptly to the Secretary of the Company. Any proposal to be considered for submission to stockholders must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and must be received by the Company in accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws and any other applicable law, rule, or regulation regarding director nominations. When submitting a nomination to the Company for consideration, a stockholder must provide certain information that would be required under applicable SEC rules, including the following minimum information for each director nominee: full name, age, and address; class, series and number of Shares beneficially owned by the nominee, if any; the date such Shares were acquired and the investment intent of such acquisition; whether such stockholder believes the individual is an “interested person” of the Company, as defined in the 1940 Act; and all other information required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest or is otherwise required. To date, the Company has not received any recommendations from stockholders requesting consideration of a candidate for inclusion among the committee’s slate of nominees in the Company’s proxy statement.

Pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, for a director nomination or other business to be considered for the next annual meeting of stockholders, notice must be provided in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive office on or before December 31, 2016.2018. Such proposals must also comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC if such proposals are to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy. Any such proposal should be mailed to: Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, Inc., 6701 Center Drive, 14th Floor,Suite 1450, Los Angeles, California 90045, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The timely submission of a proposal does not guarantee its inclusion.

OTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING

The Board is not aware of any matters that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than the matters set forth herein. Should any other matters requiring a vote of stockholders arise, it is intended that the proxies that do not contain specific instructions to the contrary will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We are required to file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly and current periodic reports, proxy statements and other information meeting the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the SEC’s website athttp://www.sec.gov. Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing to the SEC’s Public Reference Room. This information will also be available free of charge by contacting us at Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, 6701 Center Drive, 14th Floor,Suite 1450, Los Angeles, CA 90045 or by telephone at (310) 943-4990.

Householding of Proxy Materials

In a further effort to reduce printing costs, postage fees and the impact on the environment, we have adopted a practice approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this practice, stockholders who have the same address and last name will receive only one copy of our proxy materials, unless any of these stockholders notifies us that he or she wishes to continue receiving individual copies. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards.

If you share an address with another stockholder and received only one set of proxy materials, but would like to request a separate copy of these materials, please contact the Company by calling (310) 943-4990 or by writing to the Company, Attn: Secretary, 6701 Center Drive, 14th Floor,Suite 1450, Los Angeles, CA 90045. Similarly, you may also contact the Company if you received multiple copies of the proxy materials and would prefer to receive a single copy in the future.

INVESTMENT ADVISER AND ADMINISTRATOR, INVESTMENT SUB-ADVISER, DEALER
MANAGER AND SUB-ADMINISTRATOR

Set forth below are the names and addresses of the Company’s investment adviser and administrator, investment sub-adviser, dealer manager and sub-administrator:

PLEASE VOTE PROMPTLY BY SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURNING IT IN THE ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE PAID RETURN ENVELOPE, OR BY VOTING ONLINE OR BY TELEPHONE.

Appendix A

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

This Audit Committee Charter was adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Triton Pacific Investment Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”), a corporation established under the laws of the State of Maryland, on the 29th31^st day of August, 2012, and amended on this the 18^th day of April, 2015.2018.

Purpose

The purpose of the audit committee shall be to (1) assure that the Board fulfills its responsibilities for the Company’s internal and external audit process, the financial reporting process and the system of risk assessment and internal controls over financial reporting; and (2) provide an avenue of communication between management, the independent auditors, the internal auditors, and the board of directors.

Powers of the Audit Committee

It shall be the responsibility of the audit committee to:

The Board will ensure that the audit committee has sufficient resources to carry out its duties.

Composition of Committee and Selection of Members

The audit committee shall consist of at least three members of the board of directors, all of which shall be independent of Company operations. The Board will appoint the audit committee members and the audit committee chair.

The committee shall include at least one member who is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements or will be able to do so within a reasonable period of time after his or her appointment to the Audit Committee, and at least one member who has had past employment experience in finance or accounting or other comparable experience or background which results in a reasonable degree of financial sophistication, and the committee shall further include members or shall take any other form as may be necessary to satisfy any applicable requirements of the Commission or any other necessary body.

Meetings

the

The Committee shall meet as often as it determines, but not less frequently than quarterly. The Audit Committee shall (i) annually review the terms of engagement, independence and performance of the Corporation’s independent auditors and recommend to the entire Board of Directors whether the engagement of the then current auditors should be renewed, (ii) review with such auditors the scope of their audit and non-audit assignments, their fees, the accounting principles to be used in the Corporation’s financial statements, the adequacy of the Corporation’s internal accounting procedures, the adequacy of its internal control procedures and any other matters required to be discussed with such auditors in order to comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations or accounting or auditing standards, (iii) review with management the Corporation’s audited financial statements, (iv) review and discuss with management and the independent auditor the Company’s quarterly financial statements, (v) review and discuss with management and the independent auditor the Company’s disclosure under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” appearing in the Company’s periodic reports , (vi) review quarterly the valuation of the assets of the Corporation and take such actions as are necessary to affirm the net asset value of the Corporation; and review, and make such recommendations to the entire Board of Directors as it deems appropriate with respect to, the Corporation’s compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations and accounting standards.

Meeting agendas will be prepared for every meeting and provided to the audit committee members along with briefing materials 5five business days before the scheduled audit committee meeting. The audit committee will act only on the affirmative vote of a majority of the members at a meeting or by unanimous consent. Minutes of these meetings will be recorded.

Responsibilities

The audit committee shall have responsibilities related to: (a) the independent auditor and annual financial statements; (b) oversight of management’s internal controls, compliance and risk assessment practices; (c) special investigations and whistleblower policies; and (d) miscellaneous issues related to the financial practices of the Company.

A.       Independent Auditors and Financial Statements

The audit committee shall:

B.       Internal Controls, Compliance and Risk Assessment

The audit committee shall:

C.       Special Investigations

The audit committee shall:

D.       Other Responsibilities of the Audit Committee

The audit committee shall:

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY.

Vote by Internet or Telephone -– QUICK☐ ☐ ☐ *** EASY

IMMEDIATE -– 24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week or by Mail

			INTERNET/MOBILE– www.cstproxyvote.com https://starportal.phxa.com/tpc/validate.aspx Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card available when you access the above website. Follow the prompts to vote your shares.
			PHONE–1 (866) 894-0537(833) 217-1790 Use a touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card available when you call. Follow the voting instructions to vote your shares.
	PLEASE DO NOT RETURN THE PROXY CARD IF YOU ARE VOTING ELECTRONICALLY OR BY PHONE.
			MAIL – Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

☐▲ FOLD HERE • DO NOT SEPARATE • INSERT IN ENVELOPE PROVIDED☐ ▲

PROXY

Please mark your votes like this

X

Please refer to the Proxy Statement for a discussion of each matter.

IF THE PROXY IS SIGNED, SUBMITTED AND NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THE PROXY SHALL BE VOTED

FOREACH OF THE PROPOSALS.As to any other matter, said proxies shall vote in accordance with their best judgment.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFORTHE FOLLOWING: